1994 Chrysler ES vs. 1968 Lotus Elan
To start off, 1994 Chrysler ES is newer by 26 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1968 Lotus Elan. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1968 Lotus Elan would be higher. At 2,213 cc (4 cylinders), 1994 Chrysler ES is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1968 Lotus Elan (104 HP @ 6250 RPM) has 11 more horse power than 1994 Chrysler ES. (93 HP @ 4800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1968 Lotus Elan should accelerate faster than 1994 Chrysler ES. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1994 Chrysler ES weights approximately 325 kg more than 1968 Lotus Elan.
Because 1968 Lotus Elan is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1968 Lotus Elan. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1994 Chrysler ES, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1994 Chrysler ES | 1968 Lotus Elan | |
Make | Chrysler | Lotus |
Model | ES | Elan |
Year Released | 1994 | 1968 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2213 cc | 1558 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 93 HP | 104 HP |
Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 6250 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 2 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1145 kg | 820 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4370 mm | 4290 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1720 mm | 1690 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1350 mm | 1200 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2470 mm | 2440 mm |