1994 Chrysler ES vs. 2000 Honda FCX
To start off, 2000 Honda FCX is newer by 6 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1994 Chrysler ES. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1994 Chrysler ES would be higher. At 2,213 cc (4 cylinders), 1994 Chrysler ES is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Honda FCX (122 HP @ 6600 RPM) has 29 more horse power than 1994 Chrysler ES. (93 HP @ 4800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2000 Honda FCX should accelerate faster than 1994 Chrysler ES. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1994 Chrysler ES weights approximately 305 kg more than 2000 Honda FCX.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2000 Honda FCX (273 Nm) has 107 more torque (in Nm) than 1994 Chrysler ES. (166 Nm). This means 2000 Honda FCX will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1994 Chrysler ES.
Compare all specifications:
| 1994 Chrysler ES | 2000 Honda FCX | |
| Make | Chrysler | Honda |
| Model | ES | FCX |
| Year Released | 1994 | 2000 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2213 cc | 999 cc |
| Engine Type | in-line | electric |
| Horse Power | 93 HP | 122 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 6600 RPM |
| Torque | 166 Nm | 273 Nm |
| Drive Type | Front | Front |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 4 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1145 kg | 840 kg |
| Wheelbase Size | 2470 mm | 2580 mm |
