1994 Chrysler ES vs. 2001 SsangYong Musso
To start off, 2001 SsangYong Musso is newer by 7 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1994 Chrysler ES. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1994 Chrysler ES would be higher. At 2,295 cc (4 cylinders), 2001 SsangYong Musso is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2001 SsangYong Musso (149 HP @ 6200 RPM) has 56 more horse power than 1994 Chrysler ES. (93 HP @ 4800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2001 SsangYong Musso should accelerate faster than 1994 Chrysler ES. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2001 SsangYong Musso weights approximately 680 kg more than 1994 Chrysler ES. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2001 SsangYong Musso is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1994 Chrysler ES. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2001 SsangYong Musso will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2001 SsangYong Musso (318 Nm @ 2800 RPM) has 152 more torque (in Nm) than 1994 Chrysler ES. (166 Nm @ 3200 RPM). This means 2001 SsangYong Musso will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1994 Chrysler ES.
Compare all specifications:
| 1994 Chrysler ES | 2001 SsangYong Musso | |
| Make | Chrysler | SsangYong |
| Model | ES | Musso |
| Year Released | 1994 | 2001 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2213 cc | 2295 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 93 HP | 149 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 6200 RPM |
| Torque | 166 Nm | 318 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 3200 RPM | 2800 RPM |
| Engine Bore Size | 87.5 mm | 90.9 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 92 mm | 88.4 mm |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 8.1:1 | 10.4:1 |
| Drive Type | Front | 4WD |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1145 kg | 1825 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4370 mm | 4660 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1720 mm | 1870 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1350 mm | 1740 mm |
