1994 Chrysler ES vs. 2006 Ford Ranger
To start off, 2006 Ford Ranger is newer by 12 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1994 Chrysler ES. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1994 Chrysler ES would be higher. At 4,016 cc (6 cylinders), 2006 Ford Ranger is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Ford Ranger (206 HP @ 5250 RPM) has 113 more horse power than 1994 Chrysler ES. (93 HP @ 4800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2006 Ford Ranger should accelerate faster than 1994 Chrysler ES. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2006 Ford Ranger weights approximately 63 kg more than 1994 Chrysler ES. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2006 Ford Ranger is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2006 Ford Ranger. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1994 Chrysler ES, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2006 Ford Ranger (323 Nm @ 3000 RPM) has 157 more torque (in Nm) than 1994 Chrysler ES. (166 Nm @ 3200 RPM). This means 2006 Ford Ranger will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1994 Chrysler ES.
Compare all specifications:
1994 Chrysler ES | 2006 Ford Ranger | |
Make | Chrysler | Ford |
Model | ES | Ranger |
Year Released | 1994 | 2006 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2213 cc | 4016 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 93 HP | 206 HP |
Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 5250 RPM |
Torque | 166 Nm | 323 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3200 RPM | 3000 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 87.5 mm | 100.4 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 92 mm | 84.4 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 8.1:1 | 9.7:1 |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1145 kg | 1208 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4370 mm | 5150 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1720 mm | 1880 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1350 mm | 1780 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2470 mm | 3010 mm |