1994 Chrysler ES vs. 2007 Mazda RX-8
To start off, 2007 Mazda RX-8 is newer by 13 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1994 Chrysler ES. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1994 Chrysler ES would be higher. At 2,213 cc (4 cylinders), 1994 Chrysler ES is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2007 Mazda RX-8 (232 HP @ 8500 RPM) has 139 more horse power than 1994 Chrysler ES. (93 HP @ 4800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2007 Mazda RX-8 should accelerate faster than 1994 Chrysler ES.
Because 2007 Mazda RX-8 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2007 Mazda RX-8. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1994 Chrysler ES, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2007 Mazda RX-8 (216 Nm @ 5500 RPM) has 50 more torque (in Nm) than 1994 Chrysler ES. (166 Nm @ 3200 RPM). This means 2007 Mazda RX-8 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1994 Chrysler ES.
Compare all specifications:
1994 Chrysler ES | 2007 Mazda RX-8 | |
Make | Chrysler | Mazda |
Model | ES | RX-8 |
Year Released | 1994 | 2007 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2213 cc | 1308 cc |
Engine Type | in-line | dual-disk rotary |
Horse Power | 93 HP | 232 HP |
Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 8500 RPM |
Torque | 166 Nm | 216 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3200 RPM | 5500 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 87.5 mm | 73 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 92 mm | 85 mm |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 4 seats |
Vehicle Length | 4370 mm | 4430 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1720 mm | 1780 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1350 mm | 1350 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2470 mm | 2710 mm |