1994 Chrysler ES vs. 2008 Honda HR-V
To start off, 2008 Honda HR-V is newer by 14 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1994 Chrysler ES. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1994 Chrysler ES would be higher. At 2,213 cc (4 cylinders), 1994 Chrysler ES is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2008 Honda HR-V weights approximately 112 kg more than 1994 Chrysler ES.
Because 2008 Honda HR-V is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1994 Chrysler ES. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2008 Honda HR-V will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1994 Chrysler ES (166 Nm @ 3200 RPM) has 31 more torque (in Nm) than 2008 Honda HR-V. (135 Nm @ 3500 RPM). This means 1994 Chrysler ES will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2008 Honda HR-V.
Compare all specifications:
| 1994 Chrysler ES | 2008 Honda HR-V | |
| Make | Chrysler | Honda |
| Model | ES | HR-V |
| Year Released | 1994 | 2008 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2213 cc | 1590 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 93 HP | 0 HP |
| Torque | 166 Nm | 135 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 3200 RPM | 3500 RPM |
| Engine Bore Size | 87.5 mm | 75 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 92 mm | 90 mm |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 8.1:1 | 9.4:1 |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | 4WD |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1145 kg | 1257 kg |
| Vehicle Width | 1720 mm | 1690 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2470 mm | 2460 mm |
