1994 Chrysler ES vs. 2009 Ford Ka
To start off, 2009 Ford Ka is newer by 15 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1994 Chrysler ES. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1994 Chrysler ES would be higher. At 2,213 cc (4 cylinders), 1994 Chrysler ES is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Ford Ka (94 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 1 more horse power than 1994 Chrysler ES. (93 HP @ 4800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2009 Ford Ka should accelerate faster than 1994 Chrysler ES. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1994 Chrysler ES weights approximately 9 kg more than 2009 Ford Ka.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1994 Chrysler ES (166 Nm @ 3200 RPM) has 30 more torque (in Nm) than 2009 Ford Ka. (136 Nm @ 4250 RPM). This means 1994 Chrysler ES will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2009 Ford Ka.
Compare all specifications:
1994 Chrysler ES | 2009 Ford Ka | |
Make | Chrysler | Ford |
Model | ES | Ka |
Year Released | 1994 | 2009 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2213 cc | 1599 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 93 HP | 94 HP |
Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 5500 RPM |
Torque | 166 Nm | 136 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3200 RPM | 4250 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 87.5 mm | 82.1 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 92 mm | 75.5 mm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline - Premium |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 2 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1145 kg | 1136 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4370 mm | 3660 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1720 mm | 1690 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1350 mm | 1350 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2470 mm | 2460 mm |