1994 Chrysler ES vs. 2010 Holden Calais
To start off, 2010 Holden Calais is newer by 16 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1994 Chrysler ES. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1994 Chrysler ES would be higher. At 3,600 cc (6 cylinders), 2010 Holden Calais is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Holden Calais (278 HP) has 185 more horse power than 1994 Chrysler ES. (93 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Holden Calais should accelerate faster than 1994 Chrysler ES.
Because 2010 Holden Calais is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2010 Holden Calais. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1994 Chrysler ES, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2010 Holden Calais (350 Nm) has 184 more torque (in Nm) than 1994 Chrysler ES. (166 Nm). This means 2010 Holden Calais will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1994 Chrysler ES.
Compare all specifications:
1994 Chrysler ES | 2010 Holden Calais | |
Make | Chrysler | Holden |
Model | ES | Calais |
Year Released | 1994 | 2010 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2213 cc | 3600 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 93 HP | 278 HP |
Torque | 166 Nm | 350 Nm |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |