1994 Chrysler ES vs. 2013 Nissan Z
To start off, 2013 Nissan Z is newer by 19 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1994 Chrysler ES. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1994 Chrysler ES would be higher. At 3,700 cc (6 cylinders), 2013 Nissan Z is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2013 Nissan Z (327 HP @ 7000 RPM) has 234 more horse power than 1994 Chrysler ES. (93 HP @ 4800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2013 Nissan Z should accelerate faster than 1994 Chrysler ES. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2013 Nissan Z weights approximately 348 kg more than 1994 Chrysler ES. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2013 Nissan Z is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2013 Nissan Z. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1994 Chrysler ES, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2013 Nissan Z (366 Nm @ 5200 RPM) has 200 more torque (in Nm) than 1994 Chrysler ES. (166 Nm @ 3200 RPM). This means 2013 Nissan Z will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1994 Chrysler ES.
Compare all specifications:
1994 Chrysler ES | 2013 Nissan Z | |
Make | Chrysler | Nissan |
Model | ES | Z |
Year Released | 1994 | 2013 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2213 cc | 3700 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 93 HP | 327 HP |
Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 7000 RPM |
Torque | 166 Nm | 366 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3200 RPM | 5200 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 87.5 mm | 95 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 92 mm | 86 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 8.1:1 | 11:01:00 |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 2 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1145 kg | 1493 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4370 mm | 4246 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1720 mm | 1845 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1350 mm | 1315 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2470 mm | 2550 mm |