1994 Chrysler Le Baron vs. 1966 Sunbeam Tiger
To start off, 1994 Chrysler Le Baron is newer by 28 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Sunbeam Tiger. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Sunbeam Tiger would be higher. At 4,259 cc (8 cylinders), 1966 Sunbeam Tiger is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 1966 Sunbeam Tiger is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1966 Sunbeam Tiger. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1994 Chrysler Le Baron, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1994 Chrysler Le Baron | 1966 Sunbeam Tiger | |
Make | Chrysler | Sunbeam |
Model | Le Baron | Tiger |
Year Released | 1994 | 1966 |
Body Type | Convertible | Roadster |
Engine Size | 2501 cc | 4259 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 163 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4700 mm | 3970 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1740 mm | 1570 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1360 mm | 1310 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2560 mm | 2190 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 100 L | 27 L |