1994 Chrysler Le Baron vs. 1966 Toyota Crown
To start off, 1994 Chrysler Le Baron is newer by 28 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Toyota Crown. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Toyota Crown would be higher. At 2,599 cc, 1966 Toyota Crown is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 1966 Toyota Crown is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1966 Toyota Crown. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1994 Chrysler Le Baron, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1994 Chrysler Le Baron | 1966 Toyota Crown | |
Make | Chrysler | Toyota |
Model | Le Baron | Crown |
Year Released | 1994 | 1966 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2501 cc | 2599 cc |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 98 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4700 mm | 4730 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1740 mm | 1850 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1360 mm | 1470 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2560 mm | 2750 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 100 L | 70 L |