1994 Chrysler Le Baron vs. 1967 DAF Daffodil
To start off, 1994 Chrysler Le Baron is newer by 27 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1967 DAF Daffodil. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1967 DAF Daffodil would be higher. At 2,501 cc (4 cylinders), 1994 Chrysler Le Baron is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 1967 DAF Daffodil is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1967 DAF Daffodil. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1994 Chrysler Le Baron, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1994 Chrysler Le Baron | 1967 DAF Daffodil | |
| Make | Chrysler | DAF |
| Model | Le Baron | Daffodil |
| Year Released | 1994 | 1967 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2501 cc | 745 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 2 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 26 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Length | 4700 mm | 3620 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1740 mm | 1450 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1360 mm | 1390 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2560 mm | 2060 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 100 L | 33 L |
