1994 Chrysler Le Baron vs. 1989 Ford Aerostar
To start off, 1994 Chrysler Le Baron is newer by 5 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1989 Ford Aerostar. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1989 Ford Aerostar would be higher. At 2,979 cc (6 cylinders), 1989 Ford Aerostar is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 1989 Ford Aerostar is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1989 Ford Aerostar. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1994 Chrysler Le Baron, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1994 Chrysler Le Baron | 1989 Ford Aerostar | |
Make | Chrysler | Ford |
Model | Le Baron | Aerostar |
Year Released | 1994 | 1989 |
Body Type | Convertible | Minivan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2501 cc | 2979 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 143 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4700 mm | 4450 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1740 mm | 1830 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1360 mm | 1860 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2560 mm | 3030 mm |