1994 Chrysler Le Baron vs. 2003 Jaguar XJ
To start off, 2003 Jaguar XJ is newer by 9 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1994 Chrysler Le Baron. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1994 Chrysler Le Baron would be higher. At 2,968 cc (6 cylinders), 2003 Jaguar XJ is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 2003 Jaguar XJ is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2003 Jaguar XJ. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1994 Chrysler Le Baron, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1994 Chrysler Le Baron | 2003 Jaguar XJ | |
| Make | Chrysler | Jaguar |
| Model | Le Baron | XJ |
| Year Released | 1994 | 2003 |
| Body Type | Convertible | Sedan |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2501 cc | 2968 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 240 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Length | 4700 mm | 5100 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1740 mm | 1870 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1360 mm | 1450 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2560 mm | 3040 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 100 L | 85 L |
