1994 Chrysler Le Baron vs. 2004 Mazda 6
To start off, 2004 Mazda 6 is newer by 10 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1994 Chrysler Le Baron. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1994 Chrysler Le Baron would be higher. At 2,964 cc (6 cylinders), 2004 Mazda 6 is equipped with a bigger engine.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1994 Chrysler Le Baron | 2004 Mazda 6 | |
Make | Chrysler | Mazda |
Model | Le Baron | 6 |
Year Released | 1994 | 2004 |
Body Type | Convertible | Sedan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2501 cc | 2964 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 220 HP |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4700 mm | 4750 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1740 mm | 1790 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1360 mm | 1450 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2560 mm | 2680 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 100 L | 68 L |