1994 Chrysler Le Baron vs. 2009 Ford F-250
To start off, 2009 Ford F-250 is newer by 15 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1994 Chrysler Le Baron. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1994 Chrysler Le Baron would be higher. At 5,399 cc (8 cylinders), 2009 Ford F-250 is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 2009 Ford F-250 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2009 Ford F-250. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1994 Chrysler Le Baron, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1994 Chrysler Le Baron | 2009 Ford F-250 | |
| Make | Chrysler | Ford |
| Model | Le Baron | F-250 |
| Year Released | 1994 | 2009 |
| Body Type | Convertible | Pickup |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2501 cc | 5399 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 300 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Length | 4700 mm | 5890 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1740 mm | 2040 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1360 mm | 1950 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2560 mm | 3610 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 100 L | 115 L |
