1994 Chrysler Le Baron vs. 2011 Land Rover LR2
To start off, 2011 Land Rover LR2 is newer by 17 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1994 Chrysler Le Baron. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1994 Chrysler Le Baron would be higher. At 3,200 cc (6 cylinders), 2011 Land Rover LR2 is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 2011 Land Rover LR2 is all wheel drive (AWD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1994 Chrysler Le Baron. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2011 Land Rover LR2 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1994 Chrysler Le Baron | 2011 Land Rover LR2 | |
| Make | Chrysler | Land Rover |
| Model | Le Baron | LR2 |
| Year Released | 1994 | 2011 |
| Body Type | Convertible | SUV |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2501 cc | 3200 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 230 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | AWD |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 3 doors |
| Vehicle Length | 4700 mm | 4496 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1740 mm | 1908 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1360 mm | 1740 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2560 mm | 2659 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 100 L | 70 L |
