1994 Chrysler Viper vs. 2012 Ford Ecosport
To start off, 2012 Ford Ecosport is newer by 18 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1994 Chrysler Viper. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1994 Chrysler Viper would be higher. At 7,986 cc (10 cylinders), 1994 Chrysler Viper is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1994 Chrysler Viper (389 HP) has 271 more horse power than 2012 Ford Ecosport. (118 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1994 Chrysler Viper should accelerate faster than 2012 Ford Ecosport.
Because 1994 Chrysler Viper is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1994 Chrysler Viper. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2012 Ford Ecosport, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1994 Chrysler Viper (620 Nm @ 3600 RPM) has 450 more torque (in Nm) than 2012 Ford Ecosport. (170 Nm @ 1300 RPM). This means 1994 Chrysler Viper will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2012 Ford Ecosport.
Compare all specifications:
1994 Chrysler Viper | 2012 Ford Ecosport | |
Make | Chrysler | Ford |
Model | Viper | Ecosport |
Year Released | 1994 | 2012 |
Body Type | Roadster | SUV |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 7986 cc | 1000 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 10 cylinders | 3 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 389 HP | 118 HP |
Torque | 620 Nm | 170 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3600 RPM | 1300 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |