1994 Chrysler Voyager vs. 1982 Seat Ritmo
To start off, 1994 Chrysler Voyager is newer by 12 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Seat Ritmo. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Seat Ritmo would be higher. At 2,499 cc (4 cylinders), 1994 Chrysler Voyager is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1994 Chrysler Voyager (116 HP @ 4200 RPM) has 53 more horse power than 1982 Seat Ritmo. (63 HP @ 5800 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1994 Chrysler Voyager should accelerate faster than 1982 Seat Ritmo. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1994 Chrysler Voyager weights approximately 850 kg more than 1982 Seat Ritmo. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1994 Chrysler Voyager (250 Nm @ 2200 RPM) has 158 more torque (in Nm) than 1982 Seat Ritmo. (92 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 1994 Chrysler Voyager will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1982 Seat Ritmo.
Compare all specifications:
| 1994 Chrysler Voyager | 1982 Seat Ritmo | |
| Make | Chrysler | Seat |
| Model | Voyager | Ritmo |
| Year Released | 1994 | 1982 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2499 cc | 1196 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 116 HP | 63 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4200 RPM | 5800 RPM |
| Torque | 250 Nm | 92 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 2200 RPM | 3000 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Front |
| Number of Seats | 7 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1730 kg | 880 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4530 mm | 3950 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1840 mm | 1660 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1680 mm | 1410 mm |
