1994 Chrysler Voyager vs. 2000 Lotec C 1000
To start off, 2000 Lotec C 1000 is newer by 6 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1994 Chrysler Voyager. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1994 Chrysler Voyager would be higher. At 5,500 cc (8 cylinders), 2000 Lotec C 1000 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Lotec C 1000 (843 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 727 more horse power than 1994 Chrysler Voyager. (116 HP @ 4200 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2000 Lotec C 1000 should accelerate faster than 1994 Chrysler Voyager. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1994 Chrysler Voyager weights approximately 650 kg more than 2000 Lotec C 1000.
Because 2000 Lotec C 1000 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2000 Lotec C 1000. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1994 Chrysler Voyager, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2000 Lotec C 1000 (990 Nm @ 3900 RPM) has 740 more torque (in Nm) than 1994 Chrysler Voyager. (250 Nm @ 2200 RPM). This means 2000 Lotec C 1000 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1994 Chrysler Voyager.
Compare all specifications:
| 1994 Chrysler Voyager | 2000 Lotec C 1000 | |
| Make | Chrysler | Lotec |
| Model | Voyager | C 1000 |
| Year Released | 1994 | 2000 |
| Engine Position | Front | Middle |
| Engine Size | 2499 cc | 5500 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 116 HP | 843 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4200 RPM | 6000 RPM |
| Torque | 250 Nm | 990 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 2200 RPM | 3900 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Vehicle Weight | 1730 kg | 1080 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4530 mm | 4300 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1840 mm | 2010 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1680 mm | 1150 mm |
