1994 Citroen AX vs. 1976 Zastava 1300

To start off, 1994 Citroen AX is newer by 18 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1976 Zastava 1300. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1976 Zastava 1300 would be higher. At 1,295 cc (4 cylinders), 1976 Zastava 1300 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1976 Zastava 1300 (59 HP @ 5400 RPM) has 11 more horse power than 1994 Citroen AX. (48 HP @ 6000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1976 Zastava 1300 should accelerate faster than 1994 Citroen AX. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1976 Zastava 1300 weights approximately 292 kg more than 1994 Citroen AX. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Because 1976 Zastava 1300 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1976 Zastava 1300. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1994 Citroen AX, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1976 Zastava 1300 (93 Nm @ 3100 RPM) has 19 more torque (in Nm) than 1994 Citroen AX. (74 Nm @ 3700 RPM). This means 1976 Zastava 1300 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1994 Citroen AX.

Compare all specifications: