1994 Citroen AX vs. 2006 Isuzu KB
To start off, 2006 Isuzu KB is newer by 12 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1994 Citroen AX. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1994 Citroen AX would be higher. At 3,494 cc, 2006 Isuzu KB is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Isuzu KB (197 HP @ 5400 RPM) has 142 more horse power than 1994 Citroen AX. (55 HP @ 5000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2006 Isuzu KB should accelerate faster than 1994 Citroen AX.
Because 2006 Isuzu KB is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2006 Isuzu KB. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1994 Citroen AX, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2006 Isuzu KB (281 Nm @ 3000 RPM) has 185 more torque (in Nm) than 1994 Citroen AX. (96 Nm @ 2250 RPM). This means 2006 Isuzu KB will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1994 Citroen AX.
Compare all specifications:
1994 Citroen AX | 2006 Isuzu KB | |
Make | Citroen | Isuzu |
Model | AX | KB |
Year Released | 1994 | 2006 |
Body Type | Hatchback | Pickup |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1527 cc | 3494 cc |
Horse Power | 55 HP | 197 HP |
Engine RPM | 5000 RPM | 5400 RPM |
Torque | 96 Nm | 281 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2250 RPM | 3000 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 77 mm | 93.4 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 82 mm | 85 mm |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 3 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Length | 3510 mm | 4910 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1560 mm | 1810 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1370 mm | 1740 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 45 L | 76 L |