1994 Citroen XM vs. 1966 Isuzu Bellel
To start off, 1994 Citroen XM is newer by 28 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Isuzu Bellel. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Isuzu Bellel would be higher. At 1,998 cc (4 cylinders), 1994 Citroen XM is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1994 Citroen XM (135 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 54 more horse power than 1966 Isuzu Bellel. (81 HP @ 4600 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1994 Citroen XM should accelerate faster than 1966 Isuzu Bellel. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1994 Citroen XM weights approximately 100 kg more than 1966 Isuzu Bellel. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 1994 Citroen XM (180 Nm @ 4200 RPM) has 18 more torque (in Nm) than 1966 Isuzu Bellel. (162 Nm @ 2400 RPM). This means 1994 Citroen XM will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1966 Isuzu Bellel.
Compare all specifications:
| 1994 Citroen XM | 1966 Isuzu Bellel | |
| Make | Citroen | Isuzu |
| Model | XM | Bellel |
| Year Released | 1994 | 1966 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1998 cc | 1991 cc |
| Horse Power | 135 HP | 81 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 4600 RPM |
| Torque | 180 Nm | 162 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 4200 RPM | 2400 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
| Number of Doors | 5 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1395 kg | 1295 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4720 mm | 4480 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1800 mm | 1700 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1400 mm | 1520 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2860 mm | 2540 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 68 L | 40 L |
