1994 Citroen XM vs. 1966 Suzuki Fronte
To start off, 1994 Citroen XM is newer by 28 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Suzuki Fronte. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Suzuki Fronte would be higher. At 2,963 cc (6 cylinders), 1994 Citroen XM is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1994 Citroen XM (163 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 145 more horse power than 1966 Suzuki Fronte. (18 HP @ 5500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1994 Citroen XM should accelerate faster than 1966 Suzuki Fronte. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1994 Citroen XM weights approximately 989 kg more than 1966 Suzuki Fronte. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1994 Citroen XM (235 Nm @ 4600 RPM) has 203 more torque (in Nm) than 1966 Suzuki Fronte. (32 Nm @ 3700 RPM). This means 1994 Citroen XM will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1966 Suzuki Fronte.
Compare all specifications:
1994 Citroen XM | 1966 Suzuki Fronte | |
Make | Citroen | Suzuki |
Model | XM | Fronte |
Year Released | 1994 | 1966 |
Engine Size | 2963 cc | 360 cc |
Horse Power | 163 HP | 18 HP |
Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 5500 RPM |
Torque | 235 Nm | 32 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4600 RPM | 3700 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Vehicle Weight | 1493 kg | 504 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4720 mm | 3000 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1800 mm | 1300 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1400 mm | 1390 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2860 mm | 2060 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 80 L | 66 L |