1994 Citroen XM vs. 2003 Mazda 6
To start off, 2003 Mazda 6 is newer by 9 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1994 Citroen XM. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1994 Citroen XM would be higher. At 2,446 cc (4 cylinders), 1994 Citroen XM is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1994 Citroen XM (129 HP @ 4300 RPM) has 25 more horse power than 2003 Mazda 6. (104 HP @ 4000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1994 Citroen XM should accelerate faster than 2003 Mazda 6. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1994 Citroen XM weights approximately 242 kg more than 2003 Mazda 6. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1994 Citroen XM (285 Nm) has 45 more torque (in Nm) than 2003 Mazda 6. (240 Nm). This means 1994 Citroen XM will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2003 Mazda 6.
Compare all specifications:
1994 Citroen XM | 2003 Mazda 6 | |
Make | Citroen | Mazda |
Model | XM | 6 |
Year Released | 1994 | 2003 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2446 cc | 1594 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 129 HP | 104 HP |
Engine RPM | 4300 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Torque | 285 Nm | 240 Nm |
Fuel Type | Diesel | Gasoline - Premium |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1587 kg | 1345 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 2860 mm | 2610 mm |