1994 Citroen XM vs. 2005 Jeep Wrangler
To start off, 2005 Jeep Wrangler is newer by 11 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1994 Citroen XM. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1994 Citroen XM would be higher. At 3,966 cc (6 cylinders), 2005 Jeep Wrangler is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Jeep Wrangler (191 HP @ 3800 RPM) has 28 more horse power than 1994 Citroen XM. (163 HP @ 5600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2005 Jeep Wrangler should accelerate faster than 1994 Citroen XM.
Because 2005 Jeep Wrangler is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1994 Citroen XM. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2005 Jeep Wrangler will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2005 Jeep Wrangler (319 Nm) has 84 more torque (in Nm) than 1994 Citroen XM. (235 Nm). This means 2005 Jeep Wrangler will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1994 Citroen XM.
Compare all specifications:
| 1994 Citroen XM | 2005 Jeep Wrangler | |
| Make | Citroen | Jeep |
| Model | XM | Wrangler |
| Year Released | 1994 | 2005 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2963 cc | 3966 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 163 HP | 191 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 3800 RPM |
| Torque | 235 Nm | 319 Nm |
| Engine Bore Size | 93.1 mm | 99 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 73 mm | 87 mm |
| Drive Type | Front | 4WD |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
| Number of Doors | 5 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Length | 4720 mm | 4350 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1800 mm | 1740 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1400 mm | 1840 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2860 mm | 2630 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 80 L | 72 L |
