1994 Citroen XM vs. 2008 Mazda 6
To start off, 2008 Mazda 6 is newer by 14 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1994 Citroen XM. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1994 Citroen XM would be higher. At 2,261 cc, 2008 Mazda 6 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2008 Mazda 6 (156 HP @ 6500 RPM) has 21 more horse power than 1994 Citroen XM. (135 HP @ 5500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2008 Mazda 6 should accelerate faster than 1994 Citroen XM. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1994 Citroen XM weights approximately 11 kg more than 2008 Mazda 6.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2008 Mazda 6 (207 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 27 more torque (in Nm) than 1994 Citroen XM. (180 Nm @ 4200 RPM). This means 2008 Mazda 6 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1994 Citroen XM.
Compare all specifications:
1994 Citroen XM | 2008 Mazda 6 | |
Make | Citroen | Mazda |
Model | XM | 6 |
Year Released | 1994 | 2008 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1998 cc | 2261 cc |
Horse Power | 135 HP | 156 HP |
Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 6500 RPM |
Torque | 180 Nm | 207 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4200 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.5:1 | 10.6:1 |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1395 kg | 1384 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4720 mm | 4500 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1400 mm | 1760 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2860 mm | 2680 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 68 L | 64 L |