1994 Citroen XM vs. 2008 Renault Clio
To start off, 2008 Renault Clio is newer by 14 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1994 Citroen XM. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1994 Citroen XM would be higher. At 1,998 cc (4 cylinders), 1994 Citroen XM is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1994 Citroen XM weights approximately 340 kg more than 2008 Renault Clio.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1994 Citroen XM (180 Nm @ 4200 RPM) has 53 more torque (in Nm) than 2008 Renault Clio. (127 Nm @ 3750 RPM). This means 1994 Citroen XM will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2008 Renault Clio.
Compare all specifications:
1994 Citroen XM | 2008 Renault Clio | |
Make | Citroen | Renault |
Model | XM | Clio |
Year Released | 1994 | 2008 |
Engine Size | 1998 cc | 1390 cc |
Horse Power | 135 HP | 0 HP |
Torque | 180 Nm | 127 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4200 RPM | 3750 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 86 mm | 79.6 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 86 mm | 70 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.5:1 | 10.0:1 |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1395 kg | 1055 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4720 mm | 3780 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1400 mm | 1420 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2860 mm | 2480 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 68 L | 50 L |