1994 Citroen XM vs. 2010 Ford C-Max
To start off, 2010 Ford C-Max is newer by 16 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1994 Citroen XM. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1994 Citroen XM would be higher. At 2,963 cc (6 cylinders), 1994 Citroen XM is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1994 Citroen XM (163 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 13 more horse power than 2010 Ford C-Max. (150 HP @ 5700 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1994 Citroen XM should accelerate faster than 2010 Ford C-Max. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2010 Ford C-Max weights approximately 57 kg more than 1994 Citroen XM.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2010 Ford C-Max (270 Nm @ 1600 RPM) has 35 more torque (in Nm) than 1994 Citroen XM. (235 Nm @ 4600 RPM). This means 2010 Ford C-Max will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1994 Citroen XM.
Compare all specifications:
1994 Citroen XM | 2010 Ford C-Max | |
Make | Citroen | Ford |
Model | XM | C-Max |
Year Released | 1994 | 2010 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2963 cc | 1596 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 163 HP | 150 HP |
Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 5700 RPM |
Torque | 235 Nm | 270 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4600 RPM | 1600 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 7 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1493 kg | 1550 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4720 mm | 4520 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1800 mm | 1828 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1400 mm | 1684 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2860 mm | 2788 mm |