1994 Daewoo Arcadia vs. 1962 DAF Daffodil
To start off, 1994 Daewoo Arcadia is newer by 32 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 DAF Daffodil. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 DAF Daffodil would be higher. At 3,205 cc (6 cylinders), 1994 Daewoo Arcadia is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1994 Daewoo Arcadia (202 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 176 more horse power than 1962 DAF Daffodil. (26 HP @ 4000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1994 Daewoo Arcadia should accelerate faster than 1962 DAF Daffodil. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1994 Daewoo Arcadia weights approximately 925 kg more than 1962 DAF Daffodil. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1962 DAF Daffodil is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1962 DAF Daffodil. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1994 Daewoo Arcadia, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1994 Daewoo Arcadia | 1962 DAF Daffodil | |
| Make | Daewoo | DAF |
| Model | Arcadia | Daffodil |
| Year Released | 1994 | 1962 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3205 cc | 746 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 2 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 202 HP | 26 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 4000 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Vehicle Weight | 1590 kg | 665 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4960 mm | 3620 mm |
