1994 Daewoo Arcadia vs. 2003 Cadillac CTS

To start off, 2003 Cadillac CTS is newer by 9 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1994 Daewoo Arcadia. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1994 Daewoo Arcadia would be higher. At 3,563 cc (6 cylinders), 2003 Cadillac CTS is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 Cadillac CTS (252 HP @ 6200 RPM) has 50 more horse power than 1994 Daewoo Arcadia. (202 HP @ 5500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2003 Cadillac CTS should accelerate faster than 1994 Daewoo Arcadia. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2003 Cadillac CTS weights approximately 85 kg more than 1994 Daewoo Arcadia. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Because 2003 Cadillac CTS is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2003 Cadillac CTS. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1994 Daewoo Arcadia, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2003 Cadillac CTS has automatic transmission and 1994 Daewoo Arcadia has manual transmission. 1994 Daewoo Arcadia will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2003 Cadillac CTS will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.

Compare all specifications: