1994 Daewoo Brougham vs. 2008 Fiat Bravo
To start off, 2008 Fiat Bravo is newer by 14 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1994 Daewoo Brougham. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1994 Daewoo Brougham would be higher. At 1,998 cc (4 cylinders), 1994 Daewoo Brougham is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2008 Fiat Bravo weights approximately 48 kg more than 1994 Daewoo Brougham.
Because 1994 Daewoo Brougham is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1994 Daewoo Brougham. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2008 Fiat Bravo, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1994 Daewoo Brougham | 2008 Fiat Bravo | |
Make | Daewoo | Fiat |
Model | Brougham | Bravo |
Year Released | 1994 | 2008 |
Body Type | Sedan | Hatchback |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1998 cc | 1368 cc |
Horse Power | 108 HP | 0 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1302 kg | 1350 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4900 mm | 4340 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1730 mm | 1800 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1420 mm | 1500 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2680 mm | 2610 mm |