1994 Dodge Neon vs. 1969 Dodge Challenger
To start off, 1994 Dodge Neon is newer by 25 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1969 Dodge Challenger. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1969 Dodge Challenger would be higher. At 5,210 cc (8 cylinders), 1969 Dodge Challenger is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1969 Dodge Challenger (156 HP @ 4400 RPM) has 6 more horse power than 1994 Dodge Neon. (150 HP @ 6800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1969 Dodge Challenger should accelerate faster than 1994 Dodge Neon. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1969 Dodge Challenger weights approximately 318 kg more than 1994 Dodge Neon. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1969 Dodge Challenger is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1969 Dodge Challenger. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1994 Dodge Neon, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1969 Dodge Challenger (352 Nm @ 2000 RPM) has 174 more torque (in Nm) than 1994 Dodge Neon. (178 Nm @ 5600 RPM). This means 1969 Dodge Challenger will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1994 Dodge Neon.
Compare all specifications:
1994 Dodge Neon | 1969 Dodge Challenger | |
Make | Dodge | Dodge |
Model | Neon | Challenger |
Year Released | 1994 | 1969 |
Body Type | Sedan | Coupe |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1994 cc | 5210 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 150 HP | 156 HP |
Engine RPM | 6800 RPM | 4400 RPM |
Torque | 178 Nm | 352 Nm |
Torque RPM | 5600 RPM | 2000 RPM |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.8:1 | 8.4:1 |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1127 kg | 1445 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4370 mm | 4870 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1710 mm | 1940 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1400 mm | 1300 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2650 mm | 2800 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 42 L | 75 L |