1994 Dodge Neon vs. 1976 Ford Falcon
To start off, 1994 Dodge Neon is newer by 18 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1976 Ford Falcon. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1976 Ford Falcon would be higher. At 4,092 cc (6 cylinders), 1976 Ford Falcon is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1976 Ford Falcon (153 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 3 more horse power than 1994 Dodge Neon. (150 HP @ 6800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1976 Ford Falcon should accelerate faster than 1994 Dodge Neon. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1976 Ford Falcon weights approximately 253 kg more than 1994 Dodge Neon. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1976 Ford Falcon is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1976 Ford Falcon. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1994 Dodge Neon, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1976 Ford Falcon (325 Nm @ 1600 RPM) has 147 more torque (in Nm) than 1994 Dodge Neon. (178 Nm @ 5600 RPM). This means 1976 Ford Falcon will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1994 Dodge Neon.
Compare all specifications:
1994 Dodge Neon | 1976 Ford Falcon | |
Make | Dodge | Ford |
Model | Neon | Falcon |
Year Released | 1994 | 1976 |
Body Type | Sedan | Sedan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1994 cc | 4092 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 150 HP | 153 HP |
Engine RPM | 6800 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Torque | 178 Nm | 325 Nm |
Torque RPM | 5600 RPM | 1600 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 87.5 mm | 93.5 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 83 mm | 99.3 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.8:1 | 9.3:1 |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1127 kg | 1380 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4370 mm | 4870 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1710 mm | 1910 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1400 mm | 1420 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2650 mm | 2830 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 42 L | 45 L |