1994 Dodge Venom vs. 2000 Mazda 626
To start off, 2000 Mazda 626 is newer by 6 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1994 Dodge Venom. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1994 Dodge Venom would be higher. At 3,500 cc (6 cylinders), 1994 Dodge Venom is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Mazda 626 weights approximately 88 kg more than 1994 Dodge Venom.
Because 1994 Dodge Venom is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1994 Dodge Venom. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 Mazda 626, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1994 Dodge Venom (339 Nm) has 187 more torque (in Nm) than 2000 Mazda 626. (152 Nm). This means 1994 Dodge Venom will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2000 Mazda 626.
Compare all specifications:
1994 Dodge Venom | 2000 Mazda 626 | |
Make | Dodge | Mazda |
Model | Venom | 626 |
Year Released | 1994 | 2000 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3500 cc | 1769 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 100 HP |
Torque | 339 Nm | 152 Nm |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1057 kg | 1145 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4710 mm | 4770 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1910 mm | 1770 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1310 mm | 1410 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2700 mm | 2620 mm |