1994 Dodge Venom vs. 2003 Mazda 6
To start off, 2003 Mazda 6 is newer by 9 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1994 Dodge Venom. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1994 Dodge Venom would be higher. At 3,500 cc (6 cylinders), 1994 Dodge Venom is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2003 Mazda 6 weights approximately 288 kg more than 1994 Dodge Venom.
Because 1994 Dodge Venom is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1994 Dodge Venom. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2003 Mazda 6, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1994 Dodge Venom (339 Nm) has 99 more torque (in Nm) than 2003 Mazda 6. (240 Nm). This means 1994 Dodge Venom will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2003 Mazda 6.
Compare all specifications:
| 1994 Dodge Venom | 2003 Mazda 6 | |
| Make | Dodge | Mazda |
| Model | Venom | 6 |
| Year Released | 1994 | 2003 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3500 cc | 1594 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 104 HP |
| Torque | 339 Nm | 240 Nm |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1057 kg | 1345 kg |
| Wheelbase Size | 2700 mm | 2610 mm |
