1994 Donkervoort D8 vs. 2012 Audi A6
To start off, 2012 Audi A6 is newer by 18 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1994 Donkervoort D8. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1994 Donkervoort D8 would be higher. At 2,800 cc (6 cylinders), 2012 Audi A6 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2012 Audi A6 (201 HP) has 63 more horse power than 1994 Donkervoort D8. (138 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2012 Audi A6 should accelerate faster than 1994 Donkervoort D8.
Because 1994 Donkervoort D8 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1994 Donkervoort D8. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2012 Audi A6, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1994 Donkervoort D8 | 2012 Audi A6 | |
| Make | Donkervoort | Audi |
| Model | D8 | A6 |
| Year Released | 1994 | 2012 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1795 cc | 2800 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 138 HP | 201 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Length | 3420 mm | 4915 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1740 mm | 1872 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1110 mm | 1453 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2310 mm | 2911 mm |
