1994 Eagle Talon vs. 2000 Ford Puma

To start off, 2000 Ford Puma is newer by 6 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1994 Eagle Talon. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1994 Eagle Talon would be higher. At 1,996 cc (4 cylinders), 1994 Eagle Talon is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Ford Puma (153 HP @ 7000 RPM) has 20 more horse power than 1994 Eagle Talon. (133 HP @ 6000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2000 Ford Puma should accelerate faster than 1994 Eagle Talon. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Ford Puma weights approximately 45 kg more than 1994 Eagle Talon. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2000 Ford Puma (170 Nm @ 4500 RPM) has 1 more torque (in Nm) than 1994 Eagle Talon. (169 Nm @ 5000 RPM). This means 2000 Ford Puma will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1994 Eagle Talon.

Compare all specifications:

1994 Eagle Talon 2000 Ford Puma
Make Eagle Ford
Model Talon Puma
Year Released 1994 2000
Body Type Coupe Coupe
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 1996 cc 1679 cc
Engine Cylinders 4 cylinders 4 cylinders
Engine Type in-line in-line
Horse Power 133 HP 153 HP
Engine RPM 6000 RPM 7000 RPM
Torque 169 Nm 170 Nm
Torque RPM 5000 RPM 4500 RPM
Drive Type Front Front
Number of Seats 4 seats 4 seats
Number of Doors 2 doors 2 doors
Vehicle Weight 1230 kg 1275 kg
Vehicle Length 4390 mm 3990 mm
Vehicle Width 1700 mm 1780 mm
Vehicle Height 1320 mm 1320 mm
Wheelbase Size 2480 mm 2450 mm