1994 Fiat Tempra vs. 1968 ZAZ 966
To start off, 1994 Fiat Tempra is newer by 26 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1968 ZAZ 966. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1968 ZAZ 966 would be higher. At 1,995 cc (4 cylinders), 1994 Fiat Tempra is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 1968 ZAZ 966 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1968 ZAZ 966. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1994 Fiat Tempra, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1994 Fiat Tempra | 1968 ZAZ 966 | |
Make | Fiat | ZAZ |
Model | Tempra | 966 |
Year Released | 1994 | 1968 |
Engine Position | Front | Rear |
Engine Size | 1995 cc | 887 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 27 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Length | 4360 mm | 3740 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1700 mm | 1540 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1450 mm | 1380 mm |