1994 Fiat Vivace vs. 1982 Nissan Pulsar
To start off, 1994 Fiat Vivace is newer by 12 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Nissan Pulsar. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Nissan Pulsar would be higher. At 1,488 cc (4 cylinders), 1982 Nissan Pulsar is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1982 Nissan Pulsar (70 HP) has 8 more horse power than 1994 Fiat Vivace. (62 HP) In normal driving conditions, 1982 Nissan Pulsar should accelerate faster than 1994 Fiat Vivace. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1982 Nissan Pulsar weights approximately 55 kg more than 1994 Fiat Vivace. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1982 Nissan Pulsar (115 Nm @ 3200 RPM) has 13 more torque (in Nm) than 1994 Fiat Vivace. (102 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 1982 Nissan Pulsar will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1994 Fiat Vivace.
Compare all specifications:
1994 Fiat Vivace | 1982 Nissan Pulsar | |
Make | Fiat | Nissan |
Model | Vivace | Pulsar |
Year Released | 1994 | 1982 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1372 cc | 1488 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 62 HP | 70 HP |
Torque | 102 Nm | 115 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 3200 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 810 kg | 865 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3750 mm | 3970 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1550 mm | 1630 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1360 mm | 1400 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2230 mm | 2420 mm |