1994 Ford Aerostar vs. 1955 Riley RM A
To start off, 1994 Ford Aerostar is newer by 39 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1955 Riley RM A. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1955 Riley RM A would be higher. At 2,978 cc (6 cylinders), 1994 Ford Aerostar is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1994 Ford Aerostar weights approximately 279 kg more than 1955 Riley RM A.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1994 Ford Aerostar | 1955 Riley RM A | |
Make | Ford | Riley |
Model | Aerostar | RM A |
Year Released | 1994 | 1955 |
Engine Size | 2978 cc | 1496 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 133 HP | 0 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 1515 kg | 1236 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4450 mm | 4560 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1830 mm | 1620 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1860 mm | 1550 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3030 mm | 2870 mm |