1994 Ford Aerostar vs. 1958 Triumph TR3
To start off, 1994 Ford Aerostar is newer by 36 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1958 Triumph TR3. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1958 Triumph TR3 would be higher. At 2,978 cc (6 cylinders), 1994 Ford Aerostar is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1994 Ford Aerostar (133 HP @ 4600 RPM) has 39 more horse power than 1958 Triumph TR3. (94 HP @ 5000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1994 Ford Aerostar should accelerate faster than 1958 Triumph TR3. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1994 Ford Aerostar weights approximately 590 kg more than 1958 Triumph TR3. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1994 Ford Aerostar | 1958 Triumph TR3 | |
| Make | Ford | Triumph |
| Model | Aerostar | TR3 |
| Year Released | 1994 | 1958 |
| Body Type | Minivan | Roadster |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2978 cc | 1991 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 133 HP | 94 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4600 RPM | 5000 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Vehicle Weight | 1515 kg | 925 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4450 mm | 3840 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1830 mm | 1400 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1860 mm | 1280 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3030 mm | 2240 mm |
