1994 Ford Aerostar vs. 1962 Rover P5
To start off, 1994 Ford Aerostar is newer by 32 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 Rover P5. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 Rover P5 would be higher. At 2,995 cc (6 cylinders), 1962 Rover P5 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1994 Ford Aerostar (133 HP @ 4600 RPM) has 14 more horse power than 1962 Rover P5. (119 HP @ 4800 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1994 Ford Aerostar should accelerate faster than 1962 Rover P5. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1962 Rover P5 weights approximately 205 kg more than 1994 Ford Aerostar.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1962 Rover P5 (218 Nm @ 2650 RPM) has 1 more torque (in Nm) than 1994 Ford Aerostar. (217 Nm @ 2800 RPM). This means 1962 Rover P5 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1994 Ford Aerostar.
Compare all specifications:
1994 Ford Aerostar | 1962 Rover P5 | |
Make | Ford | Rover |
Model | Aerostar | P5 |
Year Released | 1994 | 1962 |
Body Type | Minivan | Coupe |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2978 cc | 2995 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 133 HP | 119 HP |
Engine RPM | 4600 RPM | 4800 RPM |
Torque | 217 Nm | 218 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2800 RPM | 2650 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 1515 kg | 1720 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4450 mm | 4750 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1830 mm | 1790 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1860 mm | 1480 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3030 mm | 2820 mm |