1994 Ford Aerostar vs. 1976 Mazda 616
To start off, 1994 Ford Aerostar is newer by 18 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1976 Mazda 616. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1976 Mazda 616 would be higher. At 2,978 cc (6 cylinders), 1994 Ford Aerostar is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1994 Ford Aerostar (133 HP @ 4600 RPM) has 54 more horse power than 1976 Mazda 616. (79 HP @ 5500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1994 Ford Aerostar should accelerate faster than 1976 Mazda 616. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1994 Ford Aerostar weights approximately 605 kg more than 1976 Mazda 616. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 1994 Ford Aerostar (217 Nm @ 2800 RPM) has 93 more torque (in Nm) than 1976 Mazda 616. (124 Nm @ 3500 RPM). This means 1994 Ford Aerostar will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1976 Mazda 616.
Compare all specifications:
1994 Ford Aerostar | 1976 Mazda 616 | |
Make | Ford | Mazda |
Model | Aerostar | 616 |
Year Released | 1994 | 1976 |
Body Type | Minivan | Coupe |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2978 cc | 1586 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 133 HP | 79 HP |
Engine RPM | 4600 RPM | 5500 RPM |
Torque | 217 Nm | 124 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2800 RPM | 3500 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Vehicle Weight | 1515 kg | 910 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4450 mm | 4160 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1830 mm | 1590 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1860 mm | 1400 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3030 mm | 2480 mm |