1994 Ford Aerostar vs. 1982 Lancia Beta
To start off, 1994 Ford Aerostar is newer by 12 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Lancia Beta. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Lancia Beta would be higher. At 2,978 cc (6 cylinders), 1994 Ford Aerostar is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1994 Ford Aerostar weights approximately 455 kg more than 1982 Lancia Beta.
Because 1994 Ford Aerostar is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1994 Ford Aerostar. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1982 Lancia Beta, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1994 Ford Aerostar | 1982 Lancia Beta | |
Make | Ford | Lancia |
Model | Aerostar | Beta |
Year Released | 1994 | 1982 |
Body Type | Minivan | Convertible |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2978 cc | 1585 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 133 HP | 0 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Vehicle Weight | 1515 kg | 1060 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4450 mm | 4050 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1830 mm | 1650 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1860 mm | 1270 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3030 mm | 2360 mm |