1994 Ford Aerostar vs. 1985 Mazda 323

To start off, 1994 Ford Aerostar is newer by 9 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1985 Mazda 323. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1985 Mazda 323 would be higher. At 2,978 cc (6 cylinders), 1994 Ford Aerostar is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1994 Ford Aerostar (133 HP @ 4600 RPM) has 61 more horse power than 1985 Mazda 323. (72 HP @ 5700 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1994 Ford Aerostar should accelerate faster than 1985 Mazda 323. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1994 Ford Aerostar weights approximately 615 kg more than 1985 Mazda 323. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Because 1994 Ford Aerostar is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1994 Ford Aerostar. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1985 Mazda 323, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1994 Ford Aerostar (217 Nm @ 2800 RPM) has 106 more torque (in Nm) than 1985 Mazda 323. (111 Nm @ 3200 RPM). This means 1994 Ford Aerostar will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1985 Mazda 323.

Compare all specifications: