1994 Ford Aerostar vs. 1996 Rover 400
To start off, 1996 Rover 400 is newer by 2 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1994 Ford Aerostar. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1994 Ford Aerostar would be higher. At 2,978 cc (6 cylinders), 1994 Ford Aerostar is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1994 Ford Aerostar (133 HP @ 4600 RPM) has 24 more horse power than 1996 Rover 400. (109 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1994 Ford Aerostar should accelerate faster than 1996 Rover 400.
Because 1994 Ford Aerostar is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1994 Ford Aerostar. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1996 Rover 400, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1994 Ford Aerostar (217 Nm @ 2800 RPM) has 72 more torque (in Nm) than 1996 Rover 400. (145 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 1994 Ford Aerostar will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1996 Rover 400.
Compare all specifications:
1994 Ford Aerostar | 1996 Rover 400 | |
Make | Ford | Rover |
Model | Aerostar | 400 |
Year Released | 1994 | 1996 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2978 cc | 1589 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 133 HP | 109 HP |
Engine RPM | 4600 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 217 Nm | 145 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2800 RPM | 3000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Vehicle Length | 4450 mm | 4370 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1830 mm | 1690 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1860 mm | 1410 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3030 mm | 2560 mm |