1994 Ford Aerostar vs. 2000 GMC Safari
To start off, 2000 GMC Safari is newer by 6 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1994 Ford Aerostar. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1994 Ford Aerostar would be higher. At 4,294 cc (6 cylinders), 2000 GMC Safari is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 GMC Safari (190 HP) has 57 more horse power than 1994 Ford Aerostar. (133 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2000 GMC Safari should accelerate faster than 1994 Ford Aerostar. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 GMC Safari weights approximately 441 kg more than 1994 Ford Aerostar. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2000 GMC Safari (319 Nm) has 102 more torque (in Nm) than 1994 Ford Aerostar. (217 Nm). This means 2000 GMC Safari will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1994 Ford Aerostar.
Compare all specifications:
1994 Ford Aerostar | 2000 GMC Safari | |
Make | Ford | GMC |
Model | Aerostar | Safari |
Year Released | 1994 | 2000 |
Body Type | Minivan | Van |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2978 cc | 4294 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Horse Power | 133 HP | 190 HP |
Torque | 217 Nm | 319 Nm |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 1515 kg | 1956 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4450 mm | 4830 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1830 mm | 1960 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1860 mm | 1940 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3030 mm | 2830 mm |