1994 Ford Aerostar vs. 2001 Mazda Tribute
To start off, 2001 Mazda Tribute is newer by 7 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1994 Ford Aerostar. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1994 Ford Aerostar would be higher. At 2,978 cc (6 cylinders), 1994 Ford Aerostar is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1994 Ford Aerostar (133 HP @ 4600 RPM) has 33 more horse power than 2001 Mazda Tribute. (100 HP @ 4000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1994 Ford Aerostar should accelerate faster than 2001 Mazda Tribute. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2001 Mazda Tribute weights approximately 270 kg more than 1994 Ford Aerostar.
Because 2001 Mazda Tribute is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1994 Ford Aerostar. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2001 Mazda Tribute will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2001 Mazda Tribute (271 Nm) has 54 more torque (in Nm) than 1994 Ford Aerostar. (217 Nm). This means 2001 Mazda Tribute will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1994 Ford Aerostar.
Compare all specifications:
1994 Ford Aerostar | 2001 Mazda Tribute | |
Make | Ford | Mazda |
Model | Aerostar | Tribute |
Year Released | 1994 | 2001 |
Body Type | Minivan | SUV |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2978 cc | 2967 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Horse Power | 133 HP | 100 HP |
Engine RPM | 4600 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Torque | 217 Nm | 271 Nm |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Vehicle Weight | 1515 kg | 1785 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4450 mm | 4400 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1830 mm | 1830 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1860 mm | 1780 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3030 mm | 2630 mm |