1994 Ford Aerostar vs. 2001 Rover 75
To start off, 2001 Rover 75 is newer by 7 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1994 Ford Aerostar. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1994 Ford Aerostar would be higher. At 2,978 cc (6 cylinders), 1994 Ford Aerostar is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2001 Rover 75 (177 HP @ 4200 RPM) has 44 more horse power than 1994 Ford Aerostar. (133 HP @ 4600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2001 Rover 75 should accelerate faster than 1994 Ford Aerostar. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1994 Ford Aerostar weights approximately 285 kg more than 2001 Rover 75.
Because 1994 Ford Aerostar is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1994 Ford Aerostar. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2001 Rover 75, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2001 Rover 75 (325 Nm) has 108 more torque (in Nm) than 1994 Ford Aerostar. (217 Nm). This means 2001 Rover 75 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1994 Ford Aerostar.
Compare all specifications:
1994 Ford Aerostar | 2001 Rover 75 | |
Make | Ford | Rover |
Model | Aerostar | 75 |
Year Released | 1994 | 2001 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2978 cc | 2501 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Horse Power | 133 HP | 177 HP |
Engine RPM | 4600 RPM | 4200 RPM |
Torque | 217 Nm | 325 Nm |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Vehicle Weight | 1515 kg | 1230 kg |